Current Issue
Past Issues
Contact Info
 
Search Letter Home
 
Related Information
 Cal Parents
Resource Guide for Parents
Parents Fund for Cal
Alumni, Parents & Friends
Visitor Services
LetterHome
A newsletter for Cal Parents
 

Academics

American Cultures Looks Ahead

Undergraduate courses in a surprising range of subject areas articulate the many cultures that have shaped the United States.

By Wendy Edelstein

Summer 2005 | Since 1989, Berkeley students have been required to fulfill the American Cultures (AC) breadth requirement, one that now serves as a national model.

This innovation, like many at Berkeley, sprang from passionate student commitment to an ideal. It follows a long tradition of student activism, from agitation in the 1880s for student self-government to the Free Speech Movement in the 1960s.

Student demand for the AC requirement arose in the 1980s from a need to factor in the myriad voices and views of an increasingly diverse campus population. Following the activist blueprint of their predecessors, students rallied on the steps of Sproul Hall and occupied the Faculty Club, eventually persuading reluctant academics to approve the proposed ethnic studies graduation requirement.

The new American Cultures courses that emerged differed significantly from existing approaches to teaching about American history, society, and culture. Students studied a broader range of ethnicities and cultures in a wider sphere of academic areas—not only the traditional social science curricula but also art, city and regional planning, environmental justice, geography, public health, rhetoric, and theater.

American Cultures courses had to focus on at least three of five groups—indigenous peoples of the U.S., African Americans, Asian Americans, Chicano/Latino Americans, and European Americans. All courses employed a theoretical and analytical approach to race, culture, and ethnicity while also exploring the ethnic groups' roles within or in relation to the United States.

Now, 16 years later, AC courses are still addressing the diversity-related issues that remain front and center on the Berkeley campus, but course content is constantly renewed. The faculty members profiled below have recently developed new American Cultures courses or redesigned existing ones to meet the campus's AC guidelines.

 
Taeku Lee

Taeku Lee
Wendy Edelstein photo

Politics from the bottom up
When he teaches Introduction to American Politics this fall, Taeku Lee, assistant professor of political science, will include "the perspectives of ordinary people" rather than focus exclusively on the top government decision makers who determine policy.

To investigate "how our founding fathers came to the negotiated document that is the U.S. Constitution," Lee will assign students to research the different perspectives of the original delegates to see "whose viewpoints were taken fully into account, whose were completely absent, and how the negotiated result occurred. I think it's impossible to go through that exercise without getting a good understanding of what the privileged ethnic categories were at the time and which ones were invisible," he says.

Lee hopes his exercises will train students to take multiple perspectives on a given issue. He thinks there's a real danger of insulating Berkeley students from ideas prevalent in the rest of the country. "Keeping in mind the pedagogical imperative of diversity," he says, "this could leave our students at a comparative disadvantage once they venture beyond the safe haven of Sather Gate—even if in defense of progressive, left-wing political ideas."

 
Leslea Hlusko

Leslea Hlusko
Wendy Edelstein photo

Myriad perspectives on biological differences
Many of Leslea Hlusko's former students have told her that they were taught in humanities classes that "there is no such thing as race." That information doesn't square with their own experiences, notes Hlusko, an assistant professor in integrative biology, who says students report that when they look at people they can "kind of tell where they come from."

"Ethnic and cultural variation is superimposed on biological variation, and it is useful for students to see that they are not necessarily linked," says Hlusko, who will teach Human Biological Variation this fall. Misunderstandings about human differences, she explains, may contribute to stereotypes, misguided political and social policies, and "just bad interactions between people."

Differences between humans, says Hlusko, in some cases "only run skin deep. Variations in traits we can easily see—such as skin color, hair texture, and nose shape—may cluster together, but other features, such as lactose intolerance, fingerprint patterns, and blood types, do not always correlate with them." Hlusko designed the course to give students that perspective, "so that they can decide for themselves whether there are valid races or not."

The course will culminate in an examination of current events, with a look at the intersection of science and politics. Hlusko cites as an example last year's California ballot initiative in which voters were asked to decide whether the state should collect information about its citizens' racial or ethnic makeup.

"I don't think we can let people graduate from college without some understanding of the implications of human biological variation on biomedical research, genetics, and evolution, and how they all tie together," says Hlusko. After all, she notes, Berkeley students will "hopefully go on to become this country's leaders. Even if the future graduates aren't making policy decisions, they will be making important choices in the voting booth."

 
George Brimhall

George Brimhall
Wendy Edelstein photo

Science with a point of view
George Brimhall, a professor of geology in the Department of Earth and Planetary Science, feels that "sustainability is only in part a scientific and technical issue—cultural, social, and international factors" now largely determine which of the planet's resources are used, the relative global environmental consequences, and whether or not international conflict ensues.

This spring, Brimhall, a resource geologist, rolled out Crossroads of Earth Resources and Society, a historical examination of how European Americans, indigenous peoples, and Asian Americans interacted while seeking their place on the land. His objective is not simply to provide students with a historical framework but to help them see how their ancestors were part of the nation's social fabric and that "the resources we use every day are part of the Earth."

One of the examples that Brimhall uses to demonstrate the influence of resources on foreign policy is the current situation in Iraq. From there the syllabus takes an ethnogeographic turn, moving far back in time to the Pleistocene era when, Brimhall says, the ancestors of Native Americans were "far from primitive peoples, surviving the worst climate variations imaginable, and very sophisticated in their understanding of nature and its cycles."

A measure of the course's success, says Brimhall, will be if students assume "a sense of ownership" of these "very real issues of sustainability. We're the greatest consumer society in the world," he observes, "and we have no idea how much stuff we use."

For more information about American Cultures courses, go to amercult.berkeley.edu.

 

       
        Copyright UC Regents. All rights reserved.
Produced and maintained by the Office of Public Affairs at UC Berkeley.

Comments? E-mail calparents@berkeley.edu.