|
Academics
American
Cultures Looks Ahead
Undergraduate
courses in a surprising range of subject areas articulate the many
cultures that have shaped the United States.
By Wendy Edelstein
Summer
2005 | Since 1989, Berkeley students have been required to
fulfill the American Cultures (AC) breadth requirement, one that now
serves as a national model.
This innovation, like many at Berkeley, sprang from passionate
student commitment to an ideal. It follows a long tradition of student
activism, from agitation in the 1880s for student self-government
to the Free Speech Movement in the 1960s.
Student demand for the AC requirement arose in the 1980s from
a need to factor in the myriad voices and views of an increasingly
diverse campus population. Following the activist blueprint of their
predecessors, students rallied on the steps of Sproul Hall and occupied
the Faculty Club, eventually persuading reluctant academics to approve
the proposed ethnic studies graduation requirement.
The new American Cultures courses that emerged differed significantly
from existing approaches to teaching about American history, society,
and culture. Students studied a broader range of ethnicities and
cultures in a wider sphere of academic areas—not only the traditional
social science curricula but also art, city and regional planning,
environmental justice, geography, public health, rhetoric, and theater.
American Cultures courses had to focus on at least three of five
groupsindigenous peoples of the U.S., African Americans, Asian Americans,
Chicano/Latino Americans, and European Americans. All courses employed
a theoretical and analytical approach to race, culture, and ethnicity
while also exploring the ethnic groups' roles within or in relation
to the United States.
Now, 16 years later, AC courses are still addressing the diversity-related
issues that remain front and center on the Berkeley campus, but
course content is constantly renewed. The faculty members profiled
below have recently developed new American Cultures courses or redesigned
existing ones to meet the campus's AC guidelines.
|


Taeku Lee
Wendy Edelstein photo |
Politics from the bottom up
When he teaches Introduction to American Politics this fall, Taeku
Lee, assistant professor of political science, will include "the
perspectives of ordinary people" rather than focus exclusively on
the top government decision makers who determine policy.
To investigate "how our founding fathers came to the negotiated
document that is the U.S. Constitution," Lee will assign students
to research the different perspectives of the original delegates
to see "whose viewpoints were taken fully into account, whose were
completely absent, and how the negotiated result occurred. I think
it's impossible to go through that exercise without getting a good
understanding of what the privileged ethnic categories were at the
time and which ones were invisible," he says.
Lee hopes his exercises will train students to take multiple perspectives
on a given issue. He thinks there's a real danger of insulating
Berkeley students from ideas prevalent in the rest of the country.
"Keeping in mind the pedagogical imperative of diversity," he says,
"this could leave our students at a comparative disadvantage once
they venture beyond the safe haven of Sather Gateeven if in defense
of progressive, left-wing political ideas."
|


Leslea Hlusko
Wendy Edelstein photo |
Myriad perspectives on biological differences
Many of Leslea Hlusko's former students have told her that they
were taught in humanities classes that "there is no such thing as
race." That information doesn't square with their own experiences,
notes Hlusko, an assistant professor in integrative biology, who
says students report that when they look at people they can "kind
of tell where they come from."
"Ethnic and cultural variation is superimposed on biological variation,
and it is useful for students to see that they are not necessarily
linked," says Hlusko, who will teach Human Biological Variation
this fall. Misunderstandings about human differences, she explains,
may contribute to stereotypes, misguided political and social policies,
and "just bad interactions between people."
Differences between humans, says Hlusko, in some cases "only run
skin deep. Variations in traits we can easily see—such as skin color,
hair texture, and nose shape—may cluster together, but other features,
such as lactose intolerance, fingerprint patterns, and blood types,
do not always correlate with them." Hlusko designed the course to
give students that perspective, "so that they can decide for themselves
whether there are valid races or not."
The course will culminate in an examination of current events,
with a look at the intersection of science and politics. Hlusko
cites as an example last year's California ballot initiative in
which voters were asked to decide whether the state should collect
information about its citizens' racial or ethnic makeup.
"I don't think we can let people graduate from college without
some understanding of the implications of human biological variation
on biomedical research, genetics, and evolution, and how they all
tie together," says Hlusko. After all, she notes, Berkeley students
will "hopefully go on to become this country's leaders. Even if
the future graduates aren't making policy decisions, they will be
making important choices in the voting booth."
|


George Brimhall
Wendy Edelstein photo |
Science with a point of view
George Brimhall, a professor of geology in the Department of Earth
and Planetary Science, feels that "sustainability is only in part
a scientific and technical issuecultural, social, and international
factors" now largely determine which of the planet's resources are
used, the relative global environmental consequences, and whether
or not international conflict ensues.
This spring, Brimhall, a resource geologist, rolled out Crossroads
of Earth Resources and Society, a historical examination of how
European Americans, indigenous peoples, and Asian Americans interacted
while seeking their place on the land. His objective is not simply
to provide students with a historical framework but to help them
see how their ancestors were part of the nation's social fabric
and that "the resources we use every day are part of the Earth."
One of the examples that Brimhall uses to demonstrate the influence
of resources on foreign policy is the current situation in Iraq.
From there the syllabus takes an ethnogeographic turn, moving far
back in time to the Pleistocene era when, Brimhall says, the ancestors
of Native Americans were "far from primitive peoples, surviving
the worst climate variations imaginable, and very sophisticated
in their understanding of nature and its cycles."
A measure of the course's success, says Brimhall, will be if students
assume "a sense of ownership" of these "very real issues of sustainability.
We're the greatest consumer society in the world," he observes,
"and we have no idea how much stuff we use."
For more information about American Cultures courses, go to amercult.berkeley.edu.
|